← Back to cases

Over $56.6 Million Forfeited In E-Gold Accounts Involved In Criminal Offenses

2014-04-23 · Press release

Mentions 1960 Verified 1960

More Than $20 Million Returned to Bona Fide Account Holders

Baltimore, Maryland - U.S. District Judge Ellen L. Hollander ordered yesterday the forfeiture of $45,816,817.84, the remaining value of over $86.3 million in e-gold, Ltd. (EGL ) accounts seized by the government in 2011. In 2012, Judge Hollander ordered the forfeiture of over $10.8 million in the EGL accounts, bringing the total amount forfeited to over $56.6 million. Judge Hollander also ordered the return of $295,642 to bona fide account holders who were able to verify their ownership of the accounts. Judge Hollander had previously ordered the return of over $19,947,313.91 to identified account holders.

The forfeiture was announced by United States Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein and Special Agent in Charge Kathy Michalko of the United States Secret Service - Washington Field Office.

U.S. Attorney Rosenstein said, “Civil forfeiture allows the government to recover the proceeds of criminal activity, while assuring that the due process rights of any lawful owners are fully protected.”

EGL was in the business of exchanging traditional forms of currency for precious metals held in electronic form, known as e-metals or e-gold, and settling payer-initiated transfers of e-metals from one customer account to another. In 2008, EGL pled guilty in the District of Columbia to money laundering and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business. EGL sold precious metals in electronic form to provide customers with a means of transferring value from one customer account to another while maintaining anonymity, knowing that at least some of the funds were involved in criminal activities. Non-traditional money transmitting businesses such as EGL are frequently used by criminals to transfer money because they are not as closely regulated as banks and other traditional financial institutions. For that reason, they must be licensed by the state in which they operate and register with the Department of the Treasury.

In 2011, the government filed a civil forfeiture action in the District of Maryland against the value of the e-gold accounts, totaling more than $86.3 million, and sent notice of the right to contest the forfeiture to the registered account holders. Some of the account holders who received the notice responded that they were the victims of identity theft and had no connection to EGL.

As part of its plea agreement, EGL identified 12,869 customer e-metal accounts that contained funds derived from a variety of criminal offenses including child pornography, credit card fraud, identity theft, investment fraud and the sale of stolen or non-existent goods on the internet. In 2012, Judge Hollander ordered the forfeiture of more than $10.8 million, the value of those accounts. Judge Hollander also ordered that that $12,287 be returned to 22 claimants from those identified accounts, whose claims the government did not contest.

The government then sought the forfeiture of the remainder of the $86.3 million as property involved in EGL’s criminal offenses, but it agreed to exempt from forfeiture any money claimed by bona fide account holders. The money forfeited yesterday represents the balance of the funds involved in the criminal offenses that was not claimed by account holders, bringing the total forfeited to the government to over $56.6 million.

Digital currencies are generally marketed as offering global acceptance without the need for conversion between national currencies, and are valued at fluctuating rates tied to the price of a particular precious metal, especially gold. Digital currency is used for on-line commerce or for funds transfers between individuals for private purposes. In general, an EGL customer opened an e-gold account, and then could use the internet to transfer the value in the account to any other EGL customer anonymously and instantaneously anywhere in the world. The recipient could then redeem the e-gold for any national currency. Because of the ease with which customers could purchase and transfer e-gold anonymously, outside of the regulated traditional banking system, trading in e-gold became popular among persons looking for a way of laundering criminal proceeds. In particular, e-gold was widely accepted as a means of transacting credit card and identification fraud, high yield investment programs and other investment scams, and child exploitation, but was not widely accepted by large or mainstream vendors.

United States Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein praised the U.S. Secret Service Washington and Orlando Field Offices and the SCIRS-SS Task Force for their work in the investigation. Mr. Rosenstein thanked Assistant United States Attorney Stefan Cassella, who handled the civil forfeiture for the government.

district_office
District of Maryland
usa_name
Rod J. Rosenstein
event_type
other
judge_name
Ellen L. Hollander
judge_title
U.S. District Judge
case_number
max_penalty_text
sentence_summary
Over $56.6 million forfeited
money_amounts
$45,816,817.84, $86.3 million, $10.8 million, $295,642, $19,947,313.91, $12,287, $56.6 million
crypto_assets
e-gold, e-metals
statutes_json
timeline_json
press_release_url
https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/pr/over-566-million-forfeited-e-gold-accounts-involved-criminal-offenses
extras_json
participant_id name role title organization location age nationality status
2941 Ellen L. Hollander judge U.S. District Judge U.S. District Court Baltimore, Maryland
2942 Rod J. Rosenstein U.S. Attorney United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Maryland Maryland
2943 Kathy Michalko Special Agent in Charge Special Agent in Charge U.S. Secret Service Washington, D.C.
2944 Stefan Cassella Assistant United States Attorney Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Maryland Maryland
2945 e-gold, Ltd. defendant e-gold, Ltd. pleaded guilty
agency_id agency_name abbreviation role office_location agents_mentioned contribution
1927 U.S. Secret Service USSS investigation Washington Field Office Kathy Michalko Seized the e-gold accounts in 2011 and contributed to the investigation
1928 U.S. Secret Service USSS investigation Orlando Field Office Participated in the investigation
1929 United States Attorney's Office for the District of Maryland prosecution District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein, Stefan Cassella Handled the civil forfeiture case and prosecuted the matter
1930 SCIRS-SS Task Force investigation Contributed to the investigation
charge_id charge_description statute severity max_penalty fine_amount defendant status participant_id cl_docket_id count_num is_1960 verified_1960 source updated_at
1515 money laundering e-gold, Ltd. (EGL) pleaded guilty 0 enrichment
1516 operating an unlicensed money transmitting business e-gold, Ltd. (EGL) pleaded guilty 1 enrichment 2026-09-16T19:46:00+00:00
3547 operating an unlicensed money transmitting business 1 press 2026-09-16T19:46:00+00:00
3548 unlicensed money transmitting business 1 press 2026-09-16T19:46:00+00:00
fin_id action_type amount currency description asset_type defendant status
1674 forfeiture $45,816,817.84 USD Remaining value of over $86.3 million in e-gold, Ltd. (EGL) accounts seized by the government in 2011 cryptocurrency EGL ordered
1675 forfeiture $10,800,000 USD Value of 12,869 customer e-metal accounts that contained funds derived from a variety of criminal offenses cryptocurrency EGL ordered
1676 return $295,642 USD Returned to bona fide account holders who were able to verify their ownership of the accounts cryptocurrency ordered
1677 return $19,947,313.91 USD Returned to identified account holders cryptocurrency ordered
1678 return $12,287 USD Returned to 22 claimants from those identified accounts, whose claims the government did not contest cryptocurrency ordered
victim_id victim_type description number_affected loss_amount geographic_scope vulnerability_factors impact_description
885 individual bona fide account holders $20,242,956.93 account holders who were able to verify their ownership of the accounts
886 individual account holders victims of identity theft
887 individual claimants 22 $12,287 claims the government did not contest
quote_id quote_text speaker_name speaker_title speaker_organization quote_type context significance
3240 Civil forfeiture allows the government to recover the proceeds of criminal activity, while assuring that the due process rights of any lawful owners are fully protected. Rod J. Rosenstein United States Attorney District of Maryland statement Announcing the forfeiture of funds from EGL accounts involved in criminal offenses Explains the purpose and process of civil forfeiture in recovering criminal proceeds while protecting lawful owners' rights
theme_id theme_name description significance related_statutes geographic_scope temporal_aspects stakeholders
2157 Civil Forfeiture Government seizure and forfeiture of over $56.6 million from e-gold accounts linked to criminal activities, with processes to return funds to legitimate account holders. Enables recovery of criminal proceeds while ensuring due process for lawful owners. 18 U.S.C. § 981, 18 U.S.C. § 1960 International Historical trend U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Secret Service, Bona Fide Account Holders, U.S. District Court
2158 Money Laundering EGL facilitated transfers of funds derived from criminal activities like child pornography and fraud through anonymous e-gold transactions. Central to EGL's criminal charges and justification for forfeiture. 18 U.S.C. § 1956, 18 U.S.C. § 1957 International Historical trend E-Gold, Ltd., Criminals, Law Enforcement Agencies
2159 Unlicensed Money Transmitting EGL operated without proper licensing, violating requirements to register with the Department of the Treasury. Contributed to EGL's criminal conviction and forfeiture. 18 U.S.C. § 1960 National Historical trend Financial Regulators, E-Gold, Ltd., U.S. Treasury Department
2160 Digital Currency and Anonymity E-gold's anonymous, unregulated digital currency system enabled criminal transactions outside traditional banking systems. Highlighted risks of unregulated digital currencies in facilitating illicit activities. International Historical trend Users, Criminals, Financial Institutions
2161 Identity Theft and Fraud E-gold accounts were used in crimes such as identity theft, credit card fraud, and investment scams. These crimes formed the basis for forfeiting the accounts' funds. International Historical trend Victims, Law Enforcement, E-Gold, Ltd.
2162 Legal Proceedings and Due Process Court-ordered forfeiture and return processes ensured adherence to legal procedures for asset recovery. Demonstrates adherence to due process in forfeiture cases. 18 U.S.C. § 981 National Recent development U.S. District Court, DOJ, Bona Fide Account Holders

CourtListener / RECAP

No linked CourtListener docket yet.